Tips
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Tip
#79
Press release, Florida Firearms Update
and Local Events
Good
afternoon Folks. Please be sure to note October 1, 2005, on your calendars. Jon
Gutmacher, author of 'Florida Firearms - Law, Use & Ownership,' will be the
featured speaker at a seminar regarding the "Protection of Persons &
Property Act" that becomes effective on that date. I have also added Jon's
latest update to his very popular and informative book. As usual, I am going to
analyze some recent local and state events. Unfortunately dadgum it, I never
seem to run out of material. It seems sometimes that Florida is significantly overly populated
with 'AO' (anal orifice) criminals! See you at Knight's!
Tnx Norm & Jane
PS -- Remember, if I may assist with either training or security concerns, please
give me a call or drop me a note!
Press Release
Knight
Shooting Sports is pleased to announce that it will host a seminar and question
and answer session on the new Florida
"Protection of Persons and Property Act." This law has raised national
media attention and goes into effect the day of the seminar, Saturday, October
1, 2005. The featured speaker will be Jon H. Gutmacher, a noted Florida trial
attorney with over thirty years of courtroom experience, who is also an NRA
certified firearms instructor, author of the widely acclaimed book,
"Florida Firearms - Law, Use & Ownership," and columnist for the
Florida Sportsman's Gazette. Mr. Gutmacher has appeared widely and was a guest
on ABC's Nightline. This event is open to the press and general public. Mr.
Gutmacher has promised to take questions from the audience on the new law and
other firearm and weapon legal issues. The event will be held on the day the
new law goes into effect, October 1, 2005, at Knight Shooting Sports, 12000 U.
S. Highway 19 N., Clearwater, Florida 33764 from 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM.
Folks, please give Knight's a call to advise of your attendance so that
Knight's management may properly plan for this major event. This is not
mandatory but any help would be deeply appreciated. You may also notify me by
email and I will add you to the rolls. Don't miss this seminar my friends. We
want our clients properly read into this sweeping change to existing Florida law. Screw that
-- I don't want you to make me look bad! However, if you plan on doing so,
please be kind enough to notify me in advance so that I may shred all your
paperwork.
Florida Firearms -- Law, Use & Ownership -- May 2005 --
update -- © 2005 by jon h. gutmacher
This is an update to the 12/2/2004 printing of the Fifth
edition
126 According
to State v. Menuto, 30 FLW 358 (Fla. App. 2DCA 2005) a mere "finding"
of delinquency, including withheld adjudication" for a felony in
juvenile court prohibits that person from owning or possessing
any firearms or electronic weapons, or carrying any concealed weapon
including chemical sprays until they reach 24 years of age. Violation
is a second degree felony! (up to 15 years in jail!)
Chap. 11 The new
"Protection of Persons/Use of Force" Act [SB 436] goes into effect on
10/1/05, and allows the use of deadly force where you reasonably believe
another person is illegally and forcefully trying to gain entry, or has
gained entry into your home, dwelling, or occupied vehicle without permission,
or is trying to remove an occupant of such against his or her will. In
such instances the law presumes you acted in reasonable fear of death or
great bodily harm to yourself or another. Another section of the law states you
need not retreat where you reasonably believe such is necessary to prevent
death or great bodily harm to yourself or another, or to prevent the
commission of a forcible felony. The law does not apply to co-residents,
does not extend to those engaged in unlawful activities, and cannot
be used against a law enforcement officer. A
more extensive explanation appears at our website at the "Legal
Q&A" section [www.FloridaFirearmsLaw.com]
14-15 On May 13, 2005,
the Fifth District Court of Appeal wrongly decided that an "antique
firearm" must be an exact replica of a firearm produced on/before
1918. Thus, a convicted felon using a modern muzzle loader was
guilty of a felony. This would also require any such firearms to be subject to
a NICS check, and F.S. 790.065 on any dealer sale.
Unexpected Outcome!
"Miami man, 24, killed after punch sends
him into traffic" St. Petersburg
Times June 21, 2005
You have
heard me frequently state words to the effect that you are not in charge of the
encounter, the bad guy is! Well, sometimes that is not true either. Neither you
nor the other guy may have control of the situation. In these situations,
'excreta occurs' very quickly as the culmination of a totally avoidable
situation. These two guys get into an argument in the parking lot of the
Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Hollywood
about 4AM reference something involving cars. These two mutts turn the parking
lot argument into a rolling road rage event and then stop in Davie to fist fight. During the fight, one
mutt punches the other in the mouth and the 24-year-old hits the road, a car
hits him in the head, the 24-year-old dies instantly and the scumbag driver
keeps on going. The guy that did the punching then flees and is captured a
short time later. Talk about unintended consequences -- one dead, one facing possible
manslaughter charges and another facing felony hit and run charges! Think
ramifications before the event goes this far. By the way, so much for Jeb
Bush's comments about common sense!
A similar situation occurred in the
parking lot of a "gentlemen's club" in Largo
June 29, 2005. That headline reads "Man hurt in attack close to bikini
bar" and appeared in the St. Petersburg Times June 30, 2005. The
25-year-old man was leaving the bar parking lot and had a minor traffic
accident. The victim and the driver were talking when a 22-year-old man who was
not involved in the accident, walked up and began to argue with the victim. A
woman stepped between them in order to stop the argument. The bystander then
decided to become a scumbag and punched the victim who then fell down and
struck his head on the pavement. The victim is now in serious condition due to
bleeding into his brain. The younger man was later arrested and charged with
"Aggravated Battery," a Third Degree Felony and now in Pinellas
County Jail with a $20,000 bond. If the victim dies, guess what? The interloper
could then face manslaughter charges.
Self Defense Shooting?
"Man kills late-night visitor at doorstep" St. Petersburg Times July
7, 2005
It's 2:30AM and you return to your St. Petersburg home.
There are people pushing a car down the street in front of your house. The gate
to your fenced yard is open. Your dog is acting funny. You have a CWP and arm
yourself with a 9MM handgun. You see a man walking toward you with something in
his hand. You yell at the intruder. The man keeps coming at you as you stand in
the back door of your own home, your castle. You fire two shots into the
intruder's chest as he steps into your back door. The intruder dies. The object
in the man's hand turns out to be papers showing ownership of the car that is
being pushed down the street. What was actually happening? Of course there are
conflicting stories but this occurred July 6, 2005, in St. Petersburg. When you analyze the news
article, the first thing that hits me is the St. Pete Times says 'visitor'
rather than 'intruder' or 'trespasser' or 'possible burglar' thereby
editorializing the event from inception. This serves as an example of the media
approach to legitimate self-defense efforts by either law enforcement or good
citizens. For instance, how many 'visitors' do you have come to your home at
2:30AM? I am not declaring this a legal self-defense shooting by any stretch of
the imagination because the home owner had a simple choice -- close and lock
the door and call the police. Apparently he had some time in which to
accomplish those things because the man was walking toward him and not running
at him according to the home owner's account. On the other hand, if the home
owner yelled at the man to stop, why did he not stop? It should not be that
difficult to figure out that such behavior at 2:30AM in someone else's yard
would be perceived as extremely threatening. Personally, I sure as heck would!
At this point, the investigation continues. My opinion -- a series of stupid
mistakes by both parties turned the situation into a tragedy for all concerned.
Oh, by the way, it is not October 1, 2005, yet so the "Protection of
Persons and Property Act" is not in effect. I will be sure to keep you
posted as this story develops.
Sex Offender Map
"County offers sex offender map" St. Petersburg Times June 20, 2005
Pinellas County now offers an improved
method for citizens to locate sex offenders. The website, www.pinellascounty.org/offender/
, allows the citizen to compare these SAO (Scumbag Anal Orifices) residences
compared to homes, schools, libraries and bus stops. This topic has become
increasingly important due to the recent brutal murders of children by known
sex offenders. Unfortunately this site will only track offenders with known
locations. If they abscond, flee or fail to report address changes, technology
alone will not help. I am absolutely in favor of monitoring devices for those
child molesters and pedophiles who are not warehoused in a six by nine steel
cages like the animals they are! Please remember, if you aren't watching your
children, someone else may be doing so!
STAY SAFE AND GOD BLESS AMERICA!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,
and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible,
with liberty and justice for all."